According to the Wiki, a branch always has autonomous PSTN connectivity, and that an apparent branch without its own PSTN connectivity is not a branch itself, but a part of another branch.
It seems to me that this is not the requirement we want, because it relaxes the survivability requirement for service in a (physical) branch office that has no PSTN connectivity -- it is not required to have its own proxy/registrar and is not required to survive if connectivity to its "real" branch is maintained. This seems a poor idea because broken WAN connections are probably the most likely failure mode. Unless it is a fact about the market that every physical location will have its own PSTN connectivity, we want to remove the requirement that branches all have PSTN connectivity. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
