On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:12 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > This question relates to which header to use for user identification > in sipxbridge calls originating from sipx and directed to the ITSP - > specifically P-Asserted-Identity vs. P-Preferred-Identity. > > P-A-I is supposed to be used inside the trust domain ( i.e. the way in > which sipx uses that today) > and P-P-I is supposed to be used outside the trust domain. > > Sipconnect only talks about P-Asserted-Identity and > hence thats what sipxbridge uses. I am wondering if > sipxbridge is considered to be within the trust domain of the ITSP once > it has successfully Registered - i.e. is it really correct to be using > P-A-I and not P-P-I. > > > I could test a few ITSP with the P-P-I header instead of P-A-I to see if that > could cause any unexpected problems. > > This issue should probably be brought to the attention of the > sipconnect forum for clarification.
Aside from any theoretical considerations, is there any practical reason to open the can and find out if there are worms in it? We appear to have a solution that's working - don't fix it. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
