Andy Spitzer wrote: > Woof! > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:43:51 -0400, Huijun Yang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> But if sipXivr does not need "passtoken", and can safely ignore the >> new element, > Yes. > >> the current changes, without adding "passtoken" to "user" should be >> sufficient to Ranga's requirement. Correct? > No. Ranga needs passtoken in the file PER USER, thus it becomes a child > of "user" (just as pintoken is today). It has to be a child of > something! >
I'll fix .xsd before committing the patch - thanks. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
