On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote: > Hi all, > > I found that when sipX (4.0.1-015823) configured to be a DNS server > during installation from iso, auto-generated dns zone file contains > the following: > > > > @ IN SOA ns1.sip.example.com. root.sip.example.com. ( > > 2009090701 ; serial# > > 1800 ; refresh, seconds > > 1800 ; retry, seconds > > 1800 ; expire, seconds > > 1800 ) ; minimum TTL, seconds > > > > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > > ; DNS Servers for 'sip.example.com' > > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > > > > ; NS record for sip.example.com > > ; server: sipx.sip.example.com > > ; > > sip.example.com. IN NS sipx.sip.example.com. > > > > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > > > > ; A record for sipx.sip.example.com > > ; > > sipx.sip.example.com. IN A 10.0.2.103 > > > > (I replaced my actual 2nd level domain with “example.com”). > > > > One can see in the above that SOA record does not correspond to NS > record. > > Primary name server in the SOA record is “ns1.sip.example.com” while > NS record says “sipx.sip.example.com”. > > I’m not quite sure if it is a serious conflict, but it would be better > (I believe) if they will coincide. > > > > I would say that SOA record should start with: > > @ IN SOA sipx.sip.example.com. root.sip.example.com. ( > > > > Should I create an issue (if my idea is correct)?
Yes, please create an issue. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
