Damian wrote: ... > We talked about marrying discovery and auto configuration > before and if done properly it's a nice vendor independent > feature. You cannot really blame me for trying to steer that > into direction that be beneficial for other types of phones, > right ;-) But of course if you want to test something Polycom > specific and if that won't clash with current discovery > that's a different matter. That might be a good first step > regardless of other considerations.
Sounds good. > Yup. I think if we stay away from mentioning "discovery" it > would be less confusing. Will do. > If this is a Polycom only special > that does not require or introduce any UI to deal with > configuring un-provisioned phones than I am fine with it. Phase 1 is Polycom only. Though, it could easily be extended to any phone that can report its MAC and specific model in the User-Agent: header of its REGISTER messages. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
