Scott wrote: >Subject: RE: [sipX-dev] Site to Site Dialing Rule Question > >Raymond wrote: > >> I guess a few more details on my dial plan are required: >> >> 1. I have a Site To Site rule that uses Gateway A. >> This rule is to be used if a dial string with a prefix of 77 >followed >> by >> 5 digits. The resultant dial string is the 5 digits to be sent over >> Gateway A. Being a Site to Site rule, there are no >permissions on it. >> >> 2. I have a Long Distance rule that uses Gateway A. >> This rule is to be used if a dial string with a PSTN prefix of 9, >> followed by a Long Distance prefix of 1 and then 10 digits. The >> permission required to use this rule is the "Long Distance Dialing" >> permission. >> >> The authrules.xml file does not contain the dial pattern for >the Site >> to Site dialing rule because it has no permission requirements. >> As a result of the dial pattern not being in the authrules.xml file, >> the catch all case (i.e. NoAccess) is used. >> >> I understand how the authrules file is used but it is correct to not >> have the Site to Site dial pattern in it? > >This sort of configuration could be done by having authrules >contain a clause that matched the dial pattern from the >site-to-site rule inside the gateway A clause, and then >specify no permissions for that one >(approximately) like this: > > <hostMatch> > <hostPattern>GATEWAY-A</hostPattern> > > <userMatch> > <userPattern>LONG-DISTANCE-DIAL-PATTERN</userPattern> > <permissionMatch> > <permission>LongDistance</permission> > </permissionMatch> > </userMatch> > > <userMatch> > <userPattern>SITE-TO-SITE-DIAL-PATTERN</userPattern> > <permissionMatch/> > </userMatch> > > </hostMatch> > >(I'm pretty sure that works, but don't know if it's been tested) > >This begs the question though - what did you think you were >doing when you did this? Is the idea to eventually use a >gateway out of the other system? If so, a better way to do it >might be to use the (not yet >implemented) peer authentication so that the permissions >enforcement is on the peer system. > >
The authrules.xml file definitely does NOT contain the dial pattern for the Site to Site dialing rule. My reasoning behind this setup was not really for any complex but simply to test the CDR call tags to be able to easily generate different types of calls (i.e. Incoming, Outgoing, Tandem, Toll Free, Long Distance, ....) and ensure that they're identified properly in the CDR records and in various reports. Raymond _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
