On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 12:32 -0400, Martin Pepin wrote: > Hi, > > I have attached a combined patch for XX-6589 and XX-6590. The code > changes are located under the sipXivr component.
There's a lot of eclipse project stuff and other property changes not related to the functionality itself mixed into the patch - can that be checked in separately please so as to clarify what is what? > The code is not yet in use but will be integrated with the Personal > Assistant component shortly. The code has been unit tested with a > separate test program. > > I am requesting permission to deliver the code changes as I do not > have subversion commit privilege. My user id is: mpepin_nortel. I have a design question about this - why is PA making an XML RPC call to sipXivr to get the presence status? Presence status is maintained in sipXrls - this seems like an excessively complicated way to go about this. Shouldn't PA get presence from sipXrls? _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
