Ranga, I believe you are 100% correct. The short term solution was XX-6663. Al From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M. Ranganathan Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 12:19 PM To: sipX developers Subject: [sipX-dev] xx-6663 and xx-6398 Hello!
XX-6663 (for which I just committed some code to the 4.0 branch) seems to meet the requirement for XX-6398 although it would be better to have TLS rather than Digest authentication. Is this a correct observation? Regards -- M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
