On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Scott Lawrence <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:43 -0400, Mark Gertsvolf wrote: > > This has got to be the funniest bug report I have read in a while! > > > I see two opportunities: > > 1. During re-INVITE processing ITSP sends provisional 180 ringing > > response to sipXbridge. Could this be the hint that the UA is setting up > > a new call? > > This seems like a possibility - an in-dialog reinvite shouldn't ever get > any 1xx response other than 100. > Yes I can drop the call if I see anything but a 100 for a re-invite. Ranga > > > 2. When ITSP sends a BYE to sipXbridge could this be a strong enough > > indication that this call is better be disconnected, even though > > sipXbridge sees that the sequence number is wrong. > > Allowing an out-of-sequence BYE to terminate a call doesn't seem like a > good idea... > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
