On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:05 -0500, Andy Spitzer wrote: > Woof! > > On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:36:31 -0500, Scott Lawrence > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Clearly, it would be better if we had a simple template that any process > > could adopt. I think that could be done now with TLS peering for > > everything if we'd just spend the effort to build an easily reusable > > framework for each of our major development languages (and not add any > > new languages that don't fit). > > Alas, that doesn't address third party applications such as POSTGRES or > FreeSWITCH.
Well, we use stunnel now for postgres (for remote access to call events in the call resolver). With a little work, we could create a generalized tool for configuring stunnel connections that would essentially do what you suggest and would use the certificates we already have.... _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
