Alfred Campbell wrote:
> Sorry for the top post however Outlook dealing with HTML emails is
> poor to say the least...
>
>
>
> Personally I like approach 2 however I have to wonder about the
> Administrator in a large new customer. If I am a 200 user customer
> where 100 users would like to use this feature then trying to support
> this will be interesting. The administrator will end up spending
> quite an effort getting those 100 users just to have MyAssistant in
> the roster. (explaining to have them go into the user portal, etc..)
> Approach 1 would really eliminate lots of the administrator work
> however give the user less freedom. For power users like Scott,
> Robert and the rest of us this maybe bad however not sure about the
average Joe.
>
>
>
> Would be interesting to hear from some folks who deploy to "normal"
> users in the community.
>
> I am with Al on that. I still think we should give admin a chance to
add PA to any group she wants. It's not like we are forcing anyone to
use > this feature and it does solve provisioning problem. It's also
simple to implement and simple to use.
> End user driven approach (2) can be implemented independently.
You are right. We don't have to choose one and abandon the other. We can
have both approaches implemented.
Thanks
Huijun
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
