On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 17:01 -0500, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:10 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> > We no longer have a name that has the properties Dale suggests (that it
> > routes to the local host first, then to any other proxy).
>
> Is there a reason we don't resuscitate an SRV name with the properties
> we want?
Two reasons:
1. It's a pain to get DNS configured correctly, and every record we
can take out of it is a win.
2. I can't think of a case in which we would not want a proxy to
prefer itself over any other proxy for the same domain, so why
not build that preference in anyway?
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
