Ian wrote: > For those IM's we do check, an alarm message requesting > another name be selected would help avoid IM IDs equivalent > to exising User name. In my opinion, there are enough name > combinations out there that I don't think accommodating new > user names equivalent to existing IM IDs is necessary.
Robert tells me there's a pending patch that rejects attempts to configure IM IDs that would clash. I think that's a good approach. Hopefully this is what you are also suggesting Ian. (Versus a new formal "Alarm" type.) -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
