On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Carolyn Beeton <[email protected]> wrote: > I am adding a new xml file containing "peer identity" mappings (from > trusted domain to internal user). > I have created an xsd file for it, under sipXbridge/schema since that is > where sipxbridge.xsd lives. > However, sipxbridge.xsd is not installed, and sipxbridge.xml is never > actually validated against it (and, in fact, it seems to fail to > validate). Should I create an issue for this?
Yes this needs to be fixed. As parameters were being tweaked ( and are still being tweaked ) in sipxbridge.xml, this got left out. We will have to make the xsd match the order in which sipxconfig generates those tags. It is decidedly bad practice not to validate xml in general but since sipxconfig generates the xml ( and it is not generated by hand ) , I might be considered forgivable. Regards, Ranga > Should I rename sipXbridge/schema to sipXbridge/meta to match the other > projects? > > Carolyn > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
