>>I noticed user's IM is disabled by default? Wouldn't it be better user
>>experience if it is enabled by >default? ( Let's say admin forget to >>enable it...) >It would be more convenient, but breaks the rule of secure by default. IM is looked at as a security hole in most enterprises and they would not >take a product seriously that came with it turned on. If I were evaluating a product that had that as default I might assume the rest of the >product is that way as well... Good point, but this IM enable/disable is at user account level. If an enterprise is not willing to compromise its security with IM service, it can disable the IM role at server level. Maybe it is left as disabled by default because only some privileged accounts can have IM service? _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
