On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > In any of the upcoming releases, has it been discussed to allow a separate > installation (HA) to run sipXbridge on it's own hardware as a standalone sbc > for sipxecs? >
SipXbridge can run on its own box. Have you run into any difficulties in doing so? You should be able to have a stand alone server with only the SBC role for it. Do you want two instances of sipXbridge ? Not sure if config server supports that given that there is a single sbc role. SipXbridge could be configured manually on a second node. Given the current mantra of Simplify Simplify Simplify, I don't know how much traction this will receive. Regards, Ranga. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
