Scott wrote,
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Interactions between 'sipx-noroute=Voicemail'
> and serialfork time-outs
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:13 -0500, Dale Worley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:06 -0500, Xingjun Chu wrote:
> > > sipx-noroute=voicemail" sounds just the opposite. like "if no
route,
> go
> > > to voicemail".
> >
> > It means "do not route to voicemail". It suppresses the generation
> of
> > one forking target.
>
> Actually, the mechanism is really more general than that... what the
> sipx-noroute parameter really means is:
>
> Do not apply any mapping rule that requires as a permission
the
> value of this parameter.
>
> The mapping rule that adds the users voicemail to the end of the list
> of
> contacts requires the permission 'Voicemail', so that attribute
> prevents
> the voicemail forwarding from being applied.
>
>
Thank you all for the explanations. But what else permission could be
in that place then other than voicemail?
Could it be certain number, or cell phone, IM client. I guess those are
all configurable somewhere. (i.e. mapping rules).
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
