On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 04:13 -0800, George Niculae wrote: > > Might it be easier to have sipXbridge raise an alarm when > > it rejects a > > connection because the server name does not match? If > > the alarm > > includes the actual name(s) from the connection, a human > > being could > > check them and put the right one into the configuration. > > Agree, is better to be done this way. I will comment XX-7319 and raise > an improvement once it hits the mainline. > Any other opinions?
I think it would be a useful addition to have a "test" button in the UI, whereby sipXconfig can order sipXbridge to make a test connection right now. Then any information from the failure can be captured and returned to the user, either via the alarm mechanism or something that makes a more direct report to the user. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
