After having a bit of a debate with myself in http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7783 I thought it better to get some insight here :-)
A couple of months ago, I set up my system with two Gateways to reach another sipx system. One used dialplan 3xx and an Unmanaged Gateway to connect directly. The other used dialplan 4xx and a sipXtrunk Gateway to connect over TLS. This worked quite successfully for basic calls. However, recently problems turned up in various transfer and park scenarios on the Unmanaged Gateway dialplan. These turned out to be due to the itspname-callback entry in forwardingrules which is added whenever a sipXtrunk Gateway is added, and causes sipxbridge to be involved in all calls to that destination, even if they are dialled by a rule that does not use that gateway. A similar issue was reported by Mark in http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5882. I think we should be able to set up dial rules to reach a given system by different routes; but if we can't, then config should not allow two gateways to be created with the same address. Thoughts? Carolyn _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
