On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 18:11 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > If it's an elaborate mechanism that's not in use, and removing it would > help you solve a current problem, cut away.
Yeah, it's elaborate, fairly straightforward to remove, causes overhead now, and gets problematic if I try to fix XX-5816 (SubscribeServer does not retry NOTIFY that fails due to 408). Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
