On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 11:01 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > In 4.2 I have a new config parameter that indicates whether or not an > ITSP supports Loose Source Routing. I propose to remove it ( one less > config parameter to support ). All reasonable ITSPs support it. > > With this removal, INIVITE will always include a Route header with > "lr" on the Route URI. > > We need to make this change as it will cause us problems when we unify > proxy and sipxbridge. > > Are there any objections to making this change?
I think it's a good idea. Any ITSP that can't handle a loose route is probably going to break later anyway, so it's a nice filter. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
