Scott wrote: >Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Registrar - Stripping user parameters >in SIP URI > >On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:08 -0400, DANS, RAYMOND (RAYMOND) wrote: >> At present, the Proxy/Registrar doesn't support/handle user >parameters >> in a SIP URI. In order to alleviate this, a new redirector >plugin was >> created whose purpose was to strip out these parameters before any >> other redirector plugin sees the request. >> The redirector plugin determines whether or not to strip the >> parameters based on an Advanced Configuration Setting (found under >> System/Servers/Services/SIP Registrar). The current default >for this >> configuration parameter is to NOT strip these parameters. Shouldn't >> the current default be to strip these parameters since we >cannot route >> properly when they're present or even more drastic, should we remove >> the configuration parameter altogether and default the functionality >> to strip the user parameters? > >Have you seen a problem with this? > >That parameter was added just to deal with compatibility with >CS1K dial strings. Prior to that, we had never encountered >parameters in the user part of the address. >
Not sure if this is what's causing the problem but I have a setup where a BCM system registers with a sipX/SCS system and any call attempts from the BCM to the sipX results in a call failure with 404-Not found. I tried calling VM (in our system 1002) and the callee AOR shows up in CDR something like <sip:1002;[email protected];user=phone> Domain changed to protect the innocent. I assumed from this, that the 404 was because it was being confused by the user params. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
