It is expected behavior. Freeswitch does not have any video codecs enabled by 
default so the video codec negotiation is failing.

Aside:

Some time ago I experimented with video conferencing by enabling H.261 and 
H.263. I still got the same error
in your screen shot but when I pressed the button again the video worked.

Freeswitch video conferencing is coded such that the video of the loudest 
speaker is transmitted to all other
video enabled participants. I found the video to be of poor quality though

In short, there is promise for video conferencing in a future release depending 
on
business priorities..

Peter


________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chitralekha
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [sipX-dev] Regarding:"video conference" for the Audio conference 
created in the SCS

Hi All,

I have a query regarding "video conference" for the conference created in the 
SCS (SCS Audio conference ).

Precondition:
----------------
1.I have created a SCS audio conference called "Qantom" with the extension 9999.
2.Create Users 200,210 and registered to any hard phones.
3.Create user 220 and register to Avaya 3456 UC Client.
4.From the users 200,210 the audio conference is established.

Now from user 220(Avaya 3456 UC Client) enter into the established audio 
conference by dialing 9999.
After the users 220 is also involved in the Audio conference click on the 
"video" icon and click on "Start my video" button available on the TUI of the 
Avaya 3456 UC Client softphone.

Results observed:
              -A pop-up window with the error message "Failed to start video" 
is displayed.
Please refer the attached image: failed_message_appeared_Video_conf.png
[cid:498224514@24032010-1CA4]

I think this is could be an expected behavior since there is no actual enduser 
as such to contact for the video device for the conference extension 9999 as we 
do it in "phone based video conferencing".

I just wanted to confirm whether this is an expected behavior or am I missing 
something here.

Thanks in Advance,
Chitralekha.

<<inline: moz-screenshot-74.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to