Thanks, Prakash - I see there is a good build now... in case you are
still around.
-Kathy

On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 01:54 -0500, Prakash PM (JIRA) wrote:
> [ 
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=49461#action_49461
>  ] 
> 
> Prakash PM commented on XX-6619:
> --------------------------------
> 
> Bob, The 'Type' in 'RAID Properties' of my SAS Adapter - SAS1068E is "RAID 1 
> (IM)" and the Status is 'Optimal'. So, I believe the RAID configuration is 
> working fine.
> 
> Kathy, I have fixed the errors that you pointed. I don't have the build with 
> r18415 today (It is r18410). I will start the test tomorrow with DEBUG 
> logging after I get this build.
> 
> Thanks,
> Prakash
> 
> > Memory usage of sipXproxy increases and the SUT swaps memory during soak 
> > testing.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: XX-6619
> >                 URL: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6619
> >             Project: sipXecs
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components: sipXproxy
> >    Affects Versions: 4.1
> >         Environment: sipxproxy 4.1.0-016475 2009-09-15T22:49:30 oem-centos5
> > Dell R-300 with 4GB RAM and 6GB Swap Area.
> >            Reporter: Prakash PM
> >            Assignee: Prakash PM
> >            Priority: Critical
> >             Fix For: 4.1.7
> >
> >         Attachments: 15_Mar-valgrind-test.zip, 17_Mar-valgrind-Report.zip, 
> > 19_Mar-valgrind.zip, Distributed_Soak_Test_Snapshot_without_logs.tar.gz, 
> > Mar19_DistribGraphs.zip, Mar19_MasterGraphs.zip, 
> > Mar_19_Distributed_Snapshot_after_valgrind_test_at_NOTICE_level_logging.tar.gz,
> >  Mar_19_Master_Snapshot_after_valgrind_test_at_NOTICE_level_logging.tar.gz, 
> > Master_Soak_Test_Snapshot_without_logs.tar.gz, 
> > memMon_reports_of_72_Hour_HA_Comm_Soak_Test_at_NOTICE_level_logging.zip, 
> > valgrind-report.txt, valgrind-report_DISTRIBUTED.txt, 
> > valgrind-report_MASTER.txt
> >
> >
> > During 72 hour Comm Soak/Media Soak Test, memory usage of sipXproxy was 
> > uniform at 20% till 32nd hour. After 32 hours ((sunday, 4AM)) it started 
> > increasing and at the end of the test it was at 57%. The SUT started 
> > swapping memory in the 50th hour and it was 30% at the end of the test.
> > The test completed with 99.9% results. But the SUBSCRIBE test was failing 
> > with '408 Request Timeout' from 48th hour, recovered in the 57th hour.
> 

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to