Ok and its an attended transfer (It would probably not fail if a blind
transfer). This behavior is supposed to be fixed in FS 1.07. I think
its being worked to bring it to a 4.3 dev build soon.

On 9/2/10, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah... But since the conferencing system is based on FreeSwitch in
> sipxecs, this becomes something FS must allow in a conference.
>
> On 9/2/10, Jean-Hugues Royer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In fact RFC4235 is what most people call BLF, it gives you the details
>> (and updates) of every call of an extension with so many information
>> (when provided by the IP PBX) that you can actually steal any call by
>> placing an INVITE/Replaces to the extension. (you can even REFER another
>> extension to do it).
>>
>> Basically for each call you know: the direction incoming/outgoing, the
>> status ringing/connected/on-hold, the caller/ee name.
>>
>> Some IP PBX have perfect support for every kind of virtual extension,
>> you can see calls in parking rooms, calls (participants) in conference
>> rooms, calls waiting in  different types of queues.
>>
>> When everything is supported (with INVITE/Replaces) you can actually
>> monitor every extension and move calls around from one extension to
>> another.
>>
>> I will definitely investigate the Valet Parking if this is the future
>> parking system of sipXecs.
>>
>> I wasn't aware of the issues of the default parking system...
>>
>> Now regarding conference extensions since the error message we get (when
>> transfering/subscribing) is not meaningful for us, I wonder if this is a
>> sipXecs bug or the feature is not supported, but usually when we
>> subscribe to sipXecs extensions where RFC4235 (or even subscription) is
>> not supported we get: 405 Method Not Allowed.
>>
>> Regarding to XX-8640 (and josh comment), it is indeed what we saw, the
>> REFER is accepted/initiated but fails with: 482 Loop Detected with 2
>> hops ago
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Tony Graziano wrote:
>>> Understand. There is a wiki page in sipfoundry that details how to use
>>> the FreeSwith "Valet Parking". Valet parking allows you to retrieve a
>>> "Valet Parking Slot" by simply dialing the extension (not *4 prefix
>>> required). To me that "simplifies the dialplan. The issue I am facing
>>> in trying to understand how to use it is how to monitor the "slots"
>>> with BLF, which the current park server in sipxecs does. I was told by
>>> the FS guys that these are monitorable with BLF if you monitor the
>>> fifo (they use mod_fifo to park the calls), but not the slot. So I was
>>> attempting to understand if this is the "same" question in a different
>>> form.
>>>
>>> I understand your need is to monitor a "conference" where the
>>> conference provides "dialogue events" to update its status with RLS
>>> for presence to be monitored, is this correct? As I understand RFC4235
>>> in a very basic way, it is BLF presence that is able to examine the
>>> dialogue events.
>>>
>>> I see you say it is working "perfectly, but also realize it is slated
>>> to be replace (current call park) due to instability issues. In large
>>> environments, calls get "stuck" in park and cannot be retrieved.
>>> Eventually the ParkServer has to be restarted and "stuck" calls even
>>> have to get kicked out of the gateway. If you do not have a volume
>>> environment, you might not be seeing the issue.
>>>
>>> There is an issue with "attended transfers" in FS through version
>>> 1.06. This is supposedly fixed in FS 1.07 but FS 1.07 is not in any
>>> builds yet. I am not aware that BLF monitoring is possible in a
>>> conference.
>>>
>>> Please see Josh's reply about XX-8640
>>>
>>> Would be helpful to understand your transfer method.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> ======================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to