Yup, that's why my original report sentence was: "Finally the RLS is not compliant with RFC4662 (and even RFC3261) because it only accepts subscription with a single "Accept" line"
We will try out this new patch and let you know if we find any other issue... Regards. Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > BTW, the reason that multiple Accept lines *must* be accepted is not the RFC > 4662 examples (because examples aren't specifications), but rather this > passage in RFC 3261 section 7.3: > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
