But they would both use the same ip? That would be nic teaming which is an os/driver level thing right?
On 9/8/10, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tony Graziano > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> From what I understand from the code, you can bind the proxy to a >>> specific >>> ip address even if other NICS are active. Giving it and address 0.0.0.0 >>> will force it to bind to all available interfaces. Can you elaborate how >>> it >>> breaks HA? >> >> OK, maybe I remembered something wrong. If it didnt glom onto all the >> interfaces it wouldnt affect HA. I may have been remembered back a bit >> farther on that issue. > > hopefully I'm not confusing the issue, but maybe the recommended use > for 2-NICs in an HA plan was to bridge them together so if one NIC > fails, the other could take it's place. So hardware fail-over. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > -- Sent from my mobile device ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
