I just ask because there are faster (or lighter weight) httpd's out there. i understand platform compatibility is a realistic limiting factor. the current apache, java, lucene stuff may not make sense to replace, but this the time to have that discussion is during the roadmap phase (I think)...
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:58 PM, George Niculae <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Tony Graziano > <[email protected]> wrote: > > no option to drop apache in lieu of a lighter weight web server using > > neoconf? or does that need to wait until tapestry is altogether gone? > > > > No, it does not need to wait until tapestry is gone but need Douglas > opinion on this option. > George > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.326.5325 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
