In the dial plan, 8+3 digits is a different scenario than 8+10 digits, and acceptable. Additionally, a dial plan of three digits exactly 911 would be different as well, and acceptable.
If you had an access code of 81 and 82 and then three digits to dial two offsite systems, that wouldn't necessarily be a conflict with dialing 8+ 3 digits for local voicemail. I would agree the system should throw an error when two dial plans are the same. But just because 8 is used at the beginning of two dial plans doesn't necessarily make it wrong, or unacceptable. I think if you further define your dial plans, and make sure they are in the correct order things will work differently. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kumaran Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [sipx-dev] Dial Plan--PSTN Prefix Hi All While working on Dial plan through unmananged gateway,I changed the PSTN prefix as 8 from 9 and the emergency is same 911. When i Dial 911 the call is landed on unmanaged gateway.But i tried 8911 the call is connected IVR(voice mail inbox of 911) and played the prompt that user extension not valid. Soo working wise its correct because 8 + Ext is Voicemail inbox prefix.But my question is why SipXconfig is not throwing a error message when changing PSTN prefix to 8 because prefix 8 is already Voicemail inbox prefix. It also reflecting in linux console as -<userPattern>8811</userPattern> Regards Venkateshwaran T _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
