[email protected] wrote:
> Send sipx-dev mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sipx-dev digest..."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [please change the subject line when replying]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: bug in sipxecs-setup-system (Josh M. Patten)
> 2. Re: Syntax error in configure (Douglas Hubler)
> 3. Automatically created Conference using user group (Kumaran)
> 4. Re: Automatically created Conference using user group
> (Douglas Hubler)
> 5. Adding a new service to sipxconfig (Eda Ercan)
> 6. Re: Adding a new service to sipxconfig (George Niculae)
> 7. Re: Adding a new service to sipxconfig (George Niculae)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-dev] bug in sipxecs-setup-system
> From:
> "Josh M. Patten" <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:37:01 +0000
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> Please don't take this script out. It is very useful in test environments to
> wipe everything out and start over when you horribly break something :-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Domenico Chierico
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:05 AM
> To: sipXecs developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [sipx-dev] bug in sipxecs-setup-system
>
>
>
> --- Mer 12/1/11, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
>
>> Da: Douglas Hubler <[email protected]>
>> Oggetto: Re: [sipx-dev] bug in sipxecs-setup-system
>> A: "sipXecs developer discussions" <[email protected]>
>> Data: Mercoledì 12 gennaio 2011, 15:43 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:33
>> AM, Domenico Chierico <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> seems that something goes wrong with timezone
>>>
>> selection into sipxecs-setup-system, on fedora 12 it don't get
>> timezone file as valid one.
>>
>> Although I don't know the history around the script, I think it was
>> meant only for ISO based installs.
>>
>> I was surprised to see sipxecs-setup-system installed by the RPMs, i
>> think it was designed for the ISO installs only and therefore should
>> be moved to the ISO install scripts.
>>
>
> Oh i get it with compiled stuff i don't know about rpm.
> It work quite well.. sometime i find it useful
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-dev] Syntax error in configure
> From:
> Douglas Hubler <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:25:01 -0500
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:01 AM, David Becker
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When running
>> ../main/configure --cache-file=`pwd`/ac-cache-file SIPXPBXUSER=sipxchange
>> SIPXPBXGROUP=sipxchange --prefix=/home/sipxchange/INSTALL/ JAVAC_DEBUG=on
>> JAVAC_OPTIMIZED=off
>> on CentOS 5.5 with the current Git version I get a syntax error in line
>> 1565. Removing that bit from configure didn't cause any problems.
>>
>
> should be fixed now on 4.4 and main line
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [sipx-dev] Automatically created Conference using user group
> From:
> Kumaran <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:21:59 +0530
> To:
> [email protected]
>
> To:
> [email protected]
>
>
> Hi All,
> First I created user group with name Testing1 and second user
> group is Testing2 and I enabled Assign conferences to new users in
> Conference page for both group
> 1.Testing1 Conference extension prefix - 222
> 2.Testing2 Conference extension prefix - 333
> Then I Created user 200 along with I added this user to both the
> group Testing1 and Testing2 .Then I checked in conference Page that
> the automatically created conference with extension 222200
> But my question is Why the conference extension created with 222200
> instead of 333200? Because in usergroup level description says
> that "The order of groups is only important when the groups have
> different values for the same setting. The setting value in the last
> group has highest precedence"
> For Eg:
> Another Scenario is Call forwarding :
> 1.Added two user groups Testing1 and Testing2
> 2.In Testing1 group set call forwarding to 30
> 3.In Testing2 group set call forwarding to 50
> 4.Create a user 201 along with add this user to both the
> group Testing1 and Testing2
> 5.Check the Call forwarding time for user 201.It will be 50
> not 30
> So the Last group has highest precedence for above
> Scenario..........So the Same thing should happen in Conference Also?
>
> Please Guide
>
> Regards
> Venkateshwaran T
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-dev] Automatically created Conference using user group
> From:
> Douglas Hubler <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:40:56 -0500
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Kumaran
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So the Last group has highest precedence for above
>> Scenario..........So the Same thing should happen in Conference Also?
>>
>
> So would you say you've tried enough settings to conclude you have a
> bug? Can you try phone groups settings as well?
>
> If this is a bug..
> It should work as advertised, it may not be a well used or understood
> feature so maybe bug was introduced and no one noticed.
>
>
Hi Douglas,
In both user and Phone group the values are reflected as
per the Last group has highest precedence.But for the checkbox,it is not
reflected as per the Last group has highest precedence
Scenario in Admin protal
1.user group first created- Testing1
2.user group second created- Testing2
Set the following modification in Testing1
Call forwarding =30
Personal AA =200
Assign auto conference to new user is enabled
Conference Prefix=666
Disable all the permission in permission page
Set the following modification in Testing2
Call forwarding =40
Personal AA=201
Assign auto conference to new user is enabled
Conference Prefix=555
Enable all the permission in permission page
Created a user 500 and added in both the group Testing1 and Testing2
When I click on 500 user and verified the above modification
Call forwarding =40 ---- as per Last group precedence
Personal AA=201------as per Last group precedence
For Permission = Im getting below Details
General Permission
Superadmin Access = Enable
(Default: checked)
Change PIN from IVR =Disabled (Default:
unchecked)
Configure Personal AA = Disabled (Default:
unchecked)
Configure Music on Hold=Disabled (Default:
unchecked)
Subscribe to Presence=Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Call Permission
900 Dialing = Enable
(Default: checked)
Attendant Directory = Enable
(Default: checked)
International Dialing =Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Local Dialing =Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Long Distance Dialing =Disabled (Default:
unchecked)
Mobile Dialing =Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Toll Free =Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Voice Mail =Disabled
(Default: unchecked)
Record System Prompts =Enabled (Default:
checked)
In Admin protal navigate to conference under feature
Conference Ext= 666500 ----------It is not
reflected as per Last group has highest precedence
Regards
Venkateshwaran T
>
> Subject:
> [sipx-dev] Adding a new service to sipxconfig
> From:
> Eda Ercan <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:00:56 +0200
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to add a new service under the Servers/Services tab and
> followed the steps in wiki:
>
> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Adding+support+for+managed+services
>
> Wiki page does not include adding that process to db sipx-services
> table and assigning a name for that process in the properties file. I
> also did those but I cannot see the process. Do I need to do anything
> other then those?
>
> Eda
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-dev] Adding a new service to sipxconfig
> From:
> George Niculae <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:07:46 +0200
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Eda Ercan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to add a new service under the Servers/Services tab and followed
>> the steps in wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Adding+support+for+managed+services
>>
>> Wiki page does not include adding that process to db sipx-services table and
>> assigning a name for that process in the properties file. I also did those
>> but I cannot see the process. Do I need to do anything other then those?
>>
>
> No need to manually add the service in db as it will automatically be
> inserted. Name for process should go in sipxconfig-web.properties,
> with label.{beanId} - take a look at how openAcd service is
> implemented.
>
> George
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [sipx-dev] Adding a new service to sipxconfig
> From:
> George Niculae <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:10:56 +0200
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:07 PM, George Niculae <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Eda Ercan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to add a new service under the Servers/Services tab and followed
>>> the steps in wiki:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Adding+support+for+managed+services
>>>
>>> Wiki page does not include adding that process to db sipx-services table and
>>> assigning a name for that process in the properties file. I also did those
>>> but I cannot see the process. Do I need to do anything other then those?
>>>
>> No need to manually add the service in db as it will automatically be
>> inserted. Name for process should go in sipxconfig-web.properties,
>> with label.{beanId} - take a look at how openAcd service is
>> implemented.
>>
>
> Please check
> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Roles,+Services+and+Processes
> for details
>
> George
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
