Kumaran wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>   
>> Send sipx-dev mailing list submissions to
>>      [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>      http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>      [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>      [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of sipx-dev digest..."
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> [please change the subject line when replying]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Importing a file (Tony Graziano)
>>    2. Re: Enable TLS for polycom (Douglas Hubler)
>>    3. erlang spec file (Matt White)
>>    4. Re: erlang spec file (Douglas Hubler)
>>    5. Re: erlang spec file (Matt White)
>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [sipx-dev] Importing a file
>> From:
>> Tony Graziano <[email protected]>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:30:27 -0500
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>         Re: [sipx-dev] Importing a file
>>         From:
>>         Tony Graziano <[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>         Date:
>>         Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:40:16 -0500
>>         To:
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>         To:
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>         The file extension is not important. Your import file
>>         contained data that
>>         could be imported in the correct format. I don't think a jira
>>         is in order
>>         (but maybe a typing class is, ;>)  ).
>>
>>         If you would like an example of the priper format, perform an
>>         export.
>>          
>>
>>        Hi Graziano,
>>                       What you said was correct.Then why config UI
>>     allow to import  .ods file ...please check the screenshot..
>>     Regards
>>     Venkateshwaran T
>>
>> You fail to interpret the intent of the design.
>>
>> The file name and extension are UNIMPORTANT. A CSV file can be saved 
>> as "any" extension type. In your case, there are extra characters in 
>> the files that are the cause of the strange characters in the import job.
>>
>> To better understand this, do an export of a clean system with a few 
>> users/lines, then open it in a text editor. In my use cases, I use 
>> excel or google docs (spreadsheet), and export the file as a csv file. 
>> It's clear the ODS file you have is using encode characters, and is 
>> not actually a valid CSV file, but because the data is inside the 
>> delimiters, it is parsing it exactly as it is told to do so.
>>
>> Example: I do an export, then login to google docs and import it. I 
>> make the changes I need (if any), then save and choose "File>download 
>> as>csv"
>>
>> I think your ODS file is a spreadsheet, but it not formatted for CSV. 
>> I know there was an ODS to CSV in github with OO (or whatever they 
>> call it these days, LibreOffice i think). I know LibreOffice has a CSV 
>> export function:
>>
>> http://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Importing_and_Exporting_CSV_Files
>>
>> In the end, this is the same thing we've discussed before. The issue 
>> is not with the file type, rather it is with the encoding. Your app is 
>> not encoding the file properly. Use a properly encoded file (the 
>> extension STILL DOES NOT MATTER).
>>  
              Hi  Graziano,
                                   Thanks for your deep information.Now 
I got it.
       Rgds
         Venkateshwaran T
>>         
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [sipx-dev] Enable TLS for polycom
>> From:
>> Douglas Hubler <[email protected]>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:57:28 -0500
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>     
>     Hi Douglas,
>                  So need not to re-open it..
> Regards
> Venkateshwaran T
>   
>   
>> you're right, patch was missed.  I just applied it, it will be in the
>> tomorrow's build.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Kumaran
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi All,
>>>  This is regarding the issue : XX-9209. It seems to be not resolved, because
>>> if I check the drop down menu of Outbound Proxy Transport under Registration
>>> --TLS option  is not present.Please guide us in this regard and Please check
>>> the screen shot attached
>>>  Regards
>>> Venkateshwaran T
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> [sipx-dev] erlang spec file
>> From:
>> "Matt White" <[email protected]>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:17:23 -0500
>> To:
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>> To:
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> The spec file from the current 4.4 sources has a typo in the erlang 
>> spec file.  It's missing the "v" for version.
>>
>> |%if| |0||%{?sles_ersion}| |!=| |0
>>
>> should be:
>>
>> |
>> |%if| |0||%{?sles_version}| |!=| |0
>>
>> which obviously breaks SLES builds ;-)
>>
>> -M
>> |
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [sipx-dev] erlang spec file
>> From:
>> Douglas Hubler <[email protected]>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:51:37 -0500
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>> To:
>> sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> ok, i'll get it in and upload srpm right away
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Matt White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> The spec file from the current 4.4 sources has a typo in the erlang spec
>>> file.  It's missing the "v" for version.
>>>
>>> %if 0%{?sles_ersion} != 0
>>>
>>> should be:
>>>
>>> %if 0%{?sles_version} != 0
>>>
>>> which obviously breaks SLES builds ;-)
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [sipx-dev] erlang spec file
>> From:
>> "Matt White" <[email protected]>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:01:22 -0500
>> To:
>> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
>>
>> To:
>> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>     
>>>>> Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> 01/20/11 8:52 AM >>>
>>>>>           
>>>> ok, i'll get it in and upload srpm right away
>>>>
>>>>         
>> Thanks, so far the srpms compile on SLES 11 x64 almost without issue.  
>> The only package I'm still working on is sipxtools.  The only other 
>> building issues have been with other project rpms like freeswitch.  
>> All the sipx packages have been building fine.
>>
>> So it looks like getting other builds from the current srpms will be 
>> fairly clean and easy.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>   

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to