On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Justin Menga <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for that - my comment around using SIPXConfig was more because it > uses a single port. Having a single port makes life a lot easier, > especially if you want to expose any of the services outside your internal > network. This is aligned with your future thinking where the web services > interface is decoupled from the various SIPX modules so I guess in time... >
Yes, you are right, is aligned with what we are looking for next releases > Also, do these all work in current 4.2 version? > No, the new one works only for 4.4 and higher (and don't think we'll port them to 4.2) George _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
