On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:40 AM, David Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > The current copyright headers in the SipX code state that it is > "Licensed to the User under the LGPL license." As the (L)GPL is not an > end user license that probably isn't the best wording but more > importantly it's missing the version number. Since there are copies of > the LGPL 2.1 in the repository it's implied that version 2.1 is used but > it's not stated whether it's only version 2.1 or if it's 2.1 or later. > > Should this be reworded?
I was hoping martin would reply, but If anyone has licensing questions, email [email protected] directly. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
