yes, the patch was put in long before release. i could reverse the patch and provide a temp build to you if we think this might be the issue.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Tony Graziano < [email protected]> wrote: > im running the stable version if 4.4 (latest). is the patch in stable? > On May 31, 2011 9:56 PM, "Douglas Hubler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Tony Graziano < > [email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> I see a much higher normal number of TCP based transactions on this > >> system. This started as soon as I started to register a couple of > >> lines via a snom device (the rest are polycom). > >> > >> I did see some tcp based transaction for a park extension in the > >> registrar log and am wondering how that can be at all? > >> > >> I was restarting the registrar every 60 seconds until after i pulled > >> the plug on the snoms. but it bothers me that a tcp based device can > >> have the same effect as a dod from inside the network. Now I have a > >> core dump as well as a snapshot, but they are extremely large. > >> > >> Why would a call park be using tcp (the phones involved in the > >> transaction are all polycom, no remotes, etc. I think the issue is a > >> two-part problem. 1. snom (though I recall specifically setting them > >> for udp only, but that was a long time ago). , 2. Why is the park > >> server using tcp? > >> > > > > there was a patch to to support GRUU that is in 4.4 and not in 4.2. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
