What if things get 'out of sync'?

ie., what if the proxy misses a 'bye'?

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Niek Vlessert <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > We created a SipX Plugin, Call Admission Control, to limit the amount of
> > calls on a per branch level. The patch is not online yet but soon will
> be,
> > and please look at the ticket.
> > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9846
>
> Conceptually design makes sense.
>
> Comments:
>
> re:user branches
> -  A user can only belong to 1 branch, so if someone is trying to
> branches for CAC and what they were originally intended for : gateway
> access. then this could be a problem.  I would have considered user
> groups for this.
>
> re: including jars?
> sipxecs 4.6 has been significantly refactored to allow for extending.
>  Almost all jars moved to sipxcommon which is just one of the
> improvements.  Did you base your work on 4.4 or 4.6?
>
> - re: Separate service
> It a C plugin, that runs within the sipxregistry project, right? What
> part of this is a separate service?  Separate project, yes, separate
> service, not sure yet.
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>



-- 
Michael Picher
eZuce
Director of Technical Services
O.978-296-1005 X2015
M.207-956-0262
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
www.ezuce.com
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to