On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote:
> New models of phones from Polycom come with version 4.0.1 now, so in order
> to support this, changes are necessary within sipXecs.  Even some of the
> phones supported in the past, such as the Polycom 335 are now released as
> the Polycom 335C and require the new firmware.  It is just a matter of time
> before someone runs into this issue.

agreed

> The Polycom’s look for a file called [mac].cfg in the TRFT root first.  If
> it doesn’t find a cfg file, then it looks to a default of 000000000000.cfg.
> Within this file currently, there are some parameters defined for loading
> some of the old firmware files into older models of Polycom.  This method
> essentially allows for running several versions of firmware on the system.
>
>
>
> I believe that file can be further modified to create model specific files
> for configuration of phones running the new firmware.  For example, adding
> code to cause the phones to look into a directory with their model name, and
> then their [mac].cfg file.   This accomplishes a few things.  First, it puts
> the configuration files for all of the same model into one directory, along
> with its current firmware and organizes things a bit.  Secondly, it allows
> these phones to pull their specific firmware, while older legacy phones can
> continue to pull their firmware from the TFTP root, or another directory all
> together.
>
>
>
> I’m currently doing this manually, and it works rather well.  Manually in
> that I move the files to the correct directory manually, but the phones find
> them automatically via the modified 000000000000.cfg file.
>
>
>
> This could actually allow for using one firmware with one particular model,
> while using a different version with another model phone.
>
>
>
> I believe this is manageable, and is actually a smaller task that originally
> thought.
>
>
>
> Question for the list – is there wisdom in breaking things out into
> different folders like this, or is it just added complexity?  Is this
> beneficial for large installations?
>
>
>
> I believe we need to get started on this sooner rather than later.  I will
> create the Jira’s necessary to get things tracked.  I would like to hear
> opinions regarding the method for managing the transition from current
> firmware files, and management of phones running on the new firmware.

If it's working for you, then it seems like a good plan. It would
require digging into project to give more helpful advice unfort.


-- 
Join me to talk about sipXecs and the upcoming version 4.6 at
  CoLab @ CSU  March (5th & 6th).
     http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipx-colab
Hack with me on at the CoLab Hackfest.
  http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/2012+sipX-CoLab+Hackfest
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to