I've just checked about this on our production system. We got the same error:
2012-07-04T01:32:07.184579Z":20021:SIP:ERR:opsip.sip2ser.it:SipClientUdp-12:58A44700:SipXProxy:"Url::parseString no valid host found at char 0 in ';tag=0s9Jiv', uriForm = name-addr" "2012-07-04T01:32:07.184691Z":20022:SIP:WARNING:opsip.sip2ser.it:SipClientUdp-12:58A44700:SipXProxy:"SipMessage::getResponseSendAddress No VIA address, using From address" "2012-07-04T01:32:07.184729Z":20023:SIP:ERR:opsip.sip2ser.it:SipClientUdp-12:58A44700:SipXProxy:"SipMessage::convertProtocolStringToEnum unrecognized protocol:" "2012-07-04T01:32:07.184738Z":20024:SIP:ERR:opsip.sip2ser.it:SipClientUdp-12:58A44700:SipXProxy:"SipTransaction::doFirstSend protocol not explicitly set - using UDP" "2012-07-04T01:32:17.199452Z":20025:SIP:ERR:opsip.sip2ser.it:SipClientUdp-12:58A44700:SipXProxy:"Url::parseString no valid host found at char 0 in ';tag=e8ApjL', uriForm = name-addr" in this days I will generate new rpm with the patch than I will let you know about On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:11 AM, George Niculae <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Domenico Chierico > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know that some latest patch are been reverted from 4.4 trunk. >> I was curious to know if this part of a reverted patch can be >> considered still valid for sipXtackLib: >> > > I think we should apply and test the patch separately then merge it in > release-4.4 if you see improvements. There is also that problem you > noticed and needs to be corrected (readBuffer(i+1)) > > George > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
