no not for me ..I'm just ready to follow your specification. So one or other is the same for me.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Tacalau <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like we'll need changes in spec files for all libs. I've opened an > internal report to keep track of this issue. > > Is this an issue for you? > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Domenico Chierico < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> that's perfect for us, but I'm seeing that in other packages the la lib >> is in standard rpm not in devel.. >> >> ref to >> sipXtackLib >> sipXcommserverLib >> >> thanks >> Domenico Chierico >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Tacalau <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Domenico, >>> >>> We'll modify the spec file to add the libsipXport.la only in the devel >>> rpm for sipXecs-4.6 from release-4.6-updates branch. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Domenico Chierico < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm just experiencing problem building rpm for sipXecs-4.6, seems that >>>> sipXportLib spec file add libsipXport.la in both regular rpm and -develop >>>> one. >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> Domenico Chierico >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
