oh wow, thanks for the update.  ISO is hard...my computer is up in the cloud
somewhere leased from a provider.  Thanks for the info on the config stuff
being broken.  I am going to have to think about next steps and where I
should go now.
thanks,
Dean

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Tony Graziano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Specific question (and some answers) can be better found through the
> sipx-dev list. Development versions are not always stable, and there are
> always minor issues, sometimes major, which is why you should never use this
> in a working environment.
>
> Have you tried a 3.11.x ISO? I've yummed a couple of 3.10 installed from
> ISO to a dev version to check things out, but not for a few weeks. If you
> look is sipx-dev lists, you'll get an idea of this, I think Ranga posted
> today he was having sipxconfig issues with the latest build. Once you get to
> a 3.11 version that gives you what you want, you probably want to disable
> your repo while you do testing.
>
> Realize 3.11 is the dev testbed for 4.0, which is not slated until sometime
> toward the end of the 1st quarter 2009, so it's got a lot of sprint work
> going into it still. Sprints mean changes, changes sometimes break things.
>
> You might be better trying 3.11.4 ISO, but might have to do manual config
> for some of sipxbridge until you know yum will not break anything. Realize
> also that sipxbridge is only partly finished. The bridge has 3 main goals as
> I understand it:
>
> 1. Connect to ITSP's (done, but still being tweaked).
> 2. Allow remote registrations through NAT (not done yet).
> 3. Be configurable/manageable via sipxconfig (just started to show in dev,
> being cleaned up).
>
> If you need production stability and trunking, i highly recommend an Ingate
> unless you can wait a few months.
>
> >>> "Dean Hiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/26/08 17:40 PM >>>
> man, 3.11 is tough to get working.  I keep trying to reclean the original
> sipx dropping db and following the wiki rpm -qa.... command as well as
> deleting all leftover sipx folders as I am trying to do a complete clean.
>  I
> finally whacked just about everything and then I was getting an error about
> missing file.....httpd-sipxchange-common-ssl.conf which for some reason was
> there but with a .in extension.  Once I erase the .in extension, it finds
> the file and complains no about invalid commands
>
> Invalid command 'nokeepalive', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module
> not
> inc
> luded in the server configuration
>
> anyone see this before?  I am having so much trouble.  I keep removing
> everything and reinstalling and it is not working too well.
> thanks for any info on this,
> Dean
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Tony Graziano <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > >>> "Dean Hiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/26/08 16:02 PM >>>
> > it is my understanding that you have to have sipXbridge to do sip
> trunking
> > with sipx.  Here are my questions
> >
> > 1. Is there not a sipXbridge that works with sipx 3.10?
> >
> > ANSWER - NO. In order to do this now you need something like an Ingate.
> >
> > 2. The yum repository for sipx 3.10 on centOS can be found on the wiki.
>  I
> > did not find one for 3.11.  Is there one for 3.11 to make this whole
> > process
> > easier?
> >
> > ANSWER - Change your yum repo to look at the dev branch, then update with
> > yum. Be aware this is not yet BETA or RC code yet, not everything will
> > likely work properly. It's development and should not be used for
> production
> > purposes.
> >
> > http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/temp/sipXecs/
> >
> > 3. Does sipXbridge install with sipx 3.11
> >
> > ANSWER - Yes, but using DEV means at your own risk.
> >
> > I googled "intall sipXbridge" and install sipx 3.11 to no avail :(.  Can
> > someone help me?  I have to be hooked up to a provider.
> >
> > also, when does sipx 4.0 come out?
> >
> > ANSWER - WIKI ROADMAP, FEB or MAR 09 currently.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Dean
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to