On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 10:16 -0800, Michael LeBlanc wrote: > We're currently using OpenSBC to provide far-end NAT traversal for UAs > on private networks. Reading though the sipXbridge wiki page, it seems > to be intended for near-end NAT traversal -- but it mentions another > service called sipxrelay. Could this service allow for FENT, eliminating > the need for far-end NAT traversal proivided by OpenSBC? > > If sipXecs 4.0 will allow for FENT, will it support SIP SUBSCRIBE > commands? We've noticed that OpenSBC doesn't support SIP SUBSCRIBE, so > UAs connected via OpenSBC don't get presence.
sipXecs 4.0 contains a comprehensive near-end and far-end NAT compensation system, which is integrated into the sipXproxy process. It also contains sipXbridge, which is intended for connecting to "SIP trunking" services. Both of them use sipXrelay for relaying media. Since sipXecs is a proxy-based system, it handles all SIP requests similarly. Hence, its NAT traversal system works for SUBSCRIBEs/NOTIFYs just as it works for INVITEs/BYEs. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
