On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:18 -0800, Alan Denby wrote: > Whereas with Asterisk and its clones, once it is set to IPv6, it > allows direct bypassing of the firewall if it is set to allow IPv6 > passthrough.
While I agree that in a perfect world IPv6 removes all the obnoxious complexity of NATs, I pretty strongly suspect that in the real world most enterprises will, even in IPv6, deploy firewalls that are still going to be a problem. This isn't the venue to debate the general merits of IPv6 vs v4, much less to bemoan the evil of NATs or the futility of perimeter security, but while I am aesthetically attracted to v6 for it's NAT properties I doubt that represents a significant real-world advantage. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
