Thanks for the replies. Yes i think that you are right. What about for the certificate problems?
How do i need to proceed? On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 12:40 -0400, Picher, Michael wrote: > Agreed... that's not a valid subnet mask... I think the smallest you > can really go is 255.255.255.252. > > That gives you a gateway address and a station address in addition to > the network number and broadcast. > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:sipx-users- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Worley > > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:01 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Some questions about latest release of > > sipxecs 3.11 > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:38 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > > The other question is this. i started sipxecs-setup script. it > > started a > > > gui interface for boost configuration. There i needed to set server > > ip > > > address. I did it and set the mask. My mask for this ip is > > > 255.255.255.255.This script does not want to accept this mask. I set > > it > > > this way: 255.255.255.0 and it accepted it. I get the ip from DHCP > > > actually, but it is static ip. > > > > I'm sure your network mask is not 255.255.255.255 -- that would mean > > that the only IP address on the subnet is your host's, and if that was > > true, your host couldn't communicate with anything. > > > > Dale > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
