On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:39 +0700, William Alianto wrote: > Here's the scenario : > > I already have a DNS server setup on my webserver. I have my sipXecs > server installed at another network. For the current setting, I have set > a pointer to the public IP of my sipXecs server on my main and secondary > DNS servers, while I set a mirror of the entry on the DNS server of my > sipXecs which point to it's own private IP. This setting works somehow. > > The question is : > > 1. Is this setting acceptable?
Yes - what you're describing is usually called "split DNS" - the answer you get for a query depends on where the query comes from. > 2. I will move both servers to the same location with multiple DMZ > router and will assign different public IP to both server. Will this > setting works as well? As long as DNS returns an address for any query that works from the perspective of the party sending the query, yes. (The complexities of running sipXecs behind any firewall are more involved - lots of ports to check). > I also want to use a 4 ports FXO gateway to dial to PSTN. I have set > them as unmanaged gateway on the server, but I got busy tone whenever I > dial the dialplan. What could be the problem? Any number of things. To debug this, you'll need to trace the message flow and see what's going wrong. See: http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Display_SIP_message_flow_using_Sipviewer#Getting_SIP_Messages_to_display when you get the trace data, take a look at it using sipviewer and/or post the trace with a description of your configuration (identify components by IP address), what you were doing, and which call in the trace you're talking about (by call-id or frame number in the trace, preferably). _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
