I don’t know if it’s worth trying (and if it’s possible and how) to modify those intervals in sipx. But as a workaround you can set requested time to 300 sec. in the UA, which looks to be a min. registration period in sipx.
(Not discussing that you would better use different, standard conforming UA). HTH, Nikolay. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wenjun Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [sipx-users] Registration Expiration Discrepancy between OSBC andSIPX Hi, some guy in OSBC forum told me this issue was well documentd in the SIPX mailing list. SIPX always replies with a registration interval that is smaller than the one requested by the UA. If the US does not adhere to the lesser interval by re-registering, then it will become unregistered for a short time. The kludgy work around for this is to set the MIN and MAX registartion interval in SIPX to be the same value as the interval in the registration request from the UA. Any one can instruct me how/where to set the proper MIN/MAX registration internal in SIPX ? Regards, Jun _____ 更多热辣资讯尽在新版MSN首页！ <http://cn.msn.com/> 立刻访问！
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
