Yes the location service stuff was for some testing to a SIP provider...
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Scheepens Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Gateway Suggestion for testing (Jim Canfield) Better late then never.... Here a 5.2 config I made, the sip part is working fine.. As far as I know the location-service is not needed in Michael's config. If I understand it correctly it is only needed if the Patton is used as a SIP-GW. If anyone can explain this better then the Patton manual then I am interested. I am still waiting for my E1 connection, so please don't look at the ISDN part (that's also why I manipulate URI's, as I am sending calls from SipXecs to SipXecs via the Patton GW to test....). Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincères salutations Paul Scheepens > > ----- Message from Jim Canfield <[email protected]> on Thu, 2 Jul > 2009 16:51:25 -0500 ----- > > To: > > "Picher, Michael" <[email protected]> > > cc: > > [email protected], [email protected] > > Subject: > > Re: [sipx-users] Gateway Suggestion for testing > > Thanks Mike, > > Patton also sent me two more 5.x configs for the 4960. One with and > one without registration (attached). I tested the later and it seems > to be working fine on the SIP side. I'll polish them up a bit and put > them on the wiki. > > -Jim >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
