On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Gabor Paller<[email protected]> wrote:
> " It does not forward the UPDATE request as
> it is a back to back user agent and not a proxy server -- conceptually
> it is hiding the trunk provider from the pbx and vice versa."
>
> Do you mean that an UPDATE cannot get through sipxbridge?

Yes that is what I meant.


All the gateways that are I have used so use re-INVITE and not UPDATE
to update session parameters.

Please open a JIRA issue with specifics on what you would like to see
supported (include the details of the gateway or phone that is using
UPDATE ).

Thanks.

>
> " sipxBridge uses re-INVITE and not UPDATE for session timer."
>
> In this particular scenario, UPDATE is used to refresh the media
> descriptor of the session. It is not related to session timer. As
> described in RFC 3311:
> " Once a dialog
>   is established, either early or confirmed, the caller can generate an
>   UPDATE method that contains an SDP offer [3] for the purposes of
>   updating the session.  The response to the UPDATE method contains the
>   answer.  Similarly, once a dialog is established, the callee can send
>   an UPDATE with an offer, and the caller places its answer in the 2xx
>   to the UPDATE.  "
>
> Re-INVITE cannot replace UPDATE in some scenarios, e.g. RFC 3960.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 July 2009 04:40
> To: Gabor Paller
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] UPDATE method and sipxbridge
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Gabor Paller<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have an authenticated SIP trunk, connected over sipxbridge. What I
> see
>> that if I send an UPDATE method to the trunk, sipxbridge immediately
>> responds with 405 Method not allowed, without consulting the trunk.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder, how sipxbridge detects that UPDATE methods are not allowed.
>
>
> When the request is sent to SipXbridge it simply responds with the
> methods that *it* supports. It does not forward the UPDATE request as
> it is a back to back user agent and not a proxy server -- conceptually
> it is hiding the trunk provider from the pbx and vice versa.
>
>  sipxBridge uses re-INVITE and not UPDATE for session timer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ranga
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gabor
>>
>> Gabor Paller, Software Architect
>> OnRelay
>>
>>
>>
>> Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0) 207 902
> 8151 |
>> [email protected] | www.onrelay.com
>>
>>
>>
>> OnRelay in the News:
>>
>> BT Trials OnRelay FMC Solution
>>
>> http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2239084/bt-trial-fixed-mobile
>>
>>
>>
>> This electronic message transmission contains information from
> OnRelay,
>> Ltd., that may be confidential or privileged. The information is
> intended
>> solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorised.
> If
>> you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
> copying,
>> distribution or use of the contents of this information or any
> attachment,
>> is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in
> error,
>> please notify us immediately by electronic mail ([email protected]) and
>> delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer.
>> Registered in England No 04006093 | Registered Office 1st Floor, 236
> Gray's
>> Inn Road, London WC1X 8HL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> M. Ranganathan
>



-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to