Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems is
load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be. In my
system I've implemented a simplistic redundancy by cloning the SipXecs
server and leaving the clone off-line, unless I need to hot-swap to it.
Not very elegant, but its better than having no redundancy at all.
Keith.
Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 15:14 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
Which other services are not supported by Redundant server?
Essentially only call routing is redundant.
Will they be
in future releases?
That varies by service, but most of the endpoint services (things that
actually answer or originate calls) are not slated to be redundant any
time soon. MoH is actually one of the easier ones to make redundant,
but it isn't all that high value...
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.12/2235 - Release Date: 07/13/09 05:56:00
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
