Someone was "playing" with is earlier this month. You would need a static
ip, and your own ami image. Remember you have no firewall or real "server
behind nat" capability.

You also would have to consider the "load" aspect as it relates to media
server in the current version.

You should consult the aws docs about submitting your own ami image. We have
several ami images of our own, but have not had the need for sipx there yet.

I feel like the 4.2 version "might" be more cloud friendly. I for one would
like an amazon s3 backup agent for it at some point too.
============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat Nov 28 13:01:11 2009
Subject: [sipx-users] SipXecs on Amazon EC2

Another question for the day...

Does anyone here have experience with Amazon EC2 and SipXecs? :)

-- Robert

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to