After thinking about this... If you only have one sbc and it is sipxbridge, this should not be not-choosable by your superadmin. I think if it breaks remote users it should be discussed, especially if you need to choose it with another SBC. ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Picher, Michael <[email protected]> To: Tony Graziano <[email protected]> Cc: Scott Lawrence <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thu Dec 31 17:22:39 2009 Subject: RE: [sipx-users] config problem or sipxbridge problem? Ok, Tony and I discovered the problem... The Internet dialing check box was checked. With this un-checked the system then properly recognizes my registration... Michael Picher"<sip:[email protected]> <sip:[email protected]:15588;rinstance=c4507e42ef6c8a8e;transport=udp;x-s ipX-privcontact=172.16.1.240%3A15588%3Btransport%3Dudp> I think a jira entry should be raised to either fix the text to the right of that check box or make it so you can't check it if you are using sipXecs provided NAT traversal. Thoughts? Or did we just hit a bug and this should work with that checked? Mike From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:45 PM To: Picher, Michael Cc: Scott Lawrence; [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] config problem or sipxbridge problem? Michael, Can you confirm the setting (schema or global) for the client? Discover Global Address or Use Local Address, etc... On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Picher, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: That registration is for a phone that IS behind a nat'd firewall (far-end). The Internet dialing is configured properly with the proper subnets. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 11:26 AM To: Picher, Michael Cc: Scott Lawrence; [email protected] Subject: RE: [sipx-users] config problem or sipxbridge problem? On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 09:35 -0500, Picher, Michael wrote: > Well, they aren't coming through port 5080... they are coming through > 5060 and using the NAT traversal piece on sipXecs (which I lump in > with sipXbridge... in my head anyway). It's only in your head... and it's confusing you (and others) > I turned off all of the NAT traversal in eyebeam have static NAT on > the local and remote firewall... no siproxd or anything on the > far-end firewall. > Here's my remote registration... > > <sip:[email protected]:14691;rinstance=6e1d94557be498a5;transport=udp ;x-sipX-nonat> That registration is for a phone that's not behind a NAT - is that true? Do you have the configuration of your server correctly describing the NAT that the server is behind and the local network address for the net it is on? _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
