On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:44 -0500, Thomas wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <40177> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > > > Being a newbie to VOIP and the various solutions, I am > charged to evaluate possible open source PBXs and will > finally influence the decision, if we join a project or > not. > > I like a lot what I have read about sipXecs on the website > and in this forum. sipXecs and SIPfoundry impressed me with > the project goals, the smoothness and the attention to the > single CD installer, as well as with the functionality I > discovered in my first rough tests. > It looks very promising! > > While I think we can cover almost any requirement, I could > not come to a definite answer for the following two > questions: > > Monitoring conversations is important and we would need to > monitor/record all calls/conversations, including the later > playback and management of the recordings. > > As far as I understand, this is not possible with sipXecs > due to the peer-to-peer communication. Is this conclusion > correct? > > I found > http://forum.sipfoundry.org/index.php?t=msg&goto=2870 and I > wonder if you did not follow up with this > http://forum.sipfoundry.org/index.php?t=msg&th=8199? > "Conferencing in the recording service" sounds like a > possible hack, if we can water down the requirement to "a > recording on demand by an operator" and could do the second > point: > > An operator must be able to listen into any currently > active calls/conversations. Is there a possibility to do > this with sipXecs?
No - not at this time (or in the 4.2 release either). _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
